|

Sustained demographic growth
Whereas the number of inhabitants in the Grand Duchy was less than 340 000 in the 1970 population census, the 450 000 mark will be exceeded during the first half of the present
decade. So in 30 years, the residential population has grown by some 100 000. A
comparison with neighbouring and nearby countries shows that this demographic
growth is rather unusual, and that during the nineties in particular Luxembourg
stood out from the rest. The increase of 30 % was distinctly higher than that
recorded in Belgium, the FRG (before reunification) or Austria. In France and
Switzerland, the increase was only half as much and, among all the countries
considered, only the Netherlands comes anywhere close.
Demographic growth in selected countries (1970 = 100.0)
Year |
Luxembourg |
Belgium |
France |
Germany |
Netherlands |
Switzerland |
Austria |
| 1970 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| 1980 |
107.4 |
102.0 |
106.3 |
100.4 |
108.7 |
102.2 |
101.2 |
| 1990 |
112.1 |
103.0 |
112.0 |
102.4 |
114.9 |
108.2 |
103.1 |
| 2000 |
130.4 |
106.2 |
116.8 |
109.4 |
123.4 |
116.8 |
108.9 |
| Source: EUROSTAT |
The salient feature of demographic growth in Luxembourg is the dominant role
played by immigration. Nationals themselves saw their numbers stagnating, and
without naturalisations and “options” they would even have fallen. Between 1970
and 2001, the records show 114 877 native deaths against 90 995 births, leaving
a natural negative balance of 23 882. This deficit was more than offset by foreign
residents taking up Luxembourg nationality. However, it should be noted that
this “integration” trend remained modest, considering the big increase in the
stock of foreign population eligible to acquire Luxembourg nationality.
Going back to the 1950s,we find that the curve showing rates of increase in
the population closely follows the one showing the net rate of immigration.
Luxembourg’s demographic development is influenced by migratory movements that
are much larger than natural movements (births and deaths).Whereas the excess
of births over deaths rarely exceeds a rate of 4 ‰, migratory balances have
peaks as high as 14 ‰. The particularly dynamic growth over the past decade,
following the much more modest growth of the 1980s, results mainly from a big
increase in annual migratory balances.
Luxembourg’s migratory balance stood at an annual average of more than 10 ‰
during the 1990- 2000 decade, whereas in the 15 EU countries, the corresponding
figure was about 2.3 ‰.
The contribution of foreigners to the rise in population isn’t limited just
to annual migratory flows. Natural, mainly positive balances contribute as well.
Owing to their particularly young age profile, there are relatively few deaths
and the number of births is continually rising. In 2001, it rose above that
of natives for the first time.
All these developments have led to a continual rise in the proportion of foreigners
in the residential population, which rose from 18.4 % in 1970 to 37.5 % in 2002.
No such percentage has been reached in any other European country.Among the
countries with a large proportion of foreigners, we should cite Liechtenstein
(34 %) and Switzerland (20 %). In practically all the other countries, the proportion
of foreigners remains below 10 %.

Marriage, divorce and fertility rates:
changing behaviour
As in other European countries, the number of marriages, divorces and births
is affected by changes in demographic behaviour.The spread of non-marital unions
and the increasingly strong propensity to live alone, are contributing to the
fall in marriages between single people, as shown by the change in first marriage
indicators. If the proportion of single people entering a first marriage observed
over the past few years is maintained in the future, then 50 % of them would
never marry. Another indication of this relative disaffection with marriage
is the percentage of births outside marriage. It was about 4 % around 1970,
and now stands at more than 20 %.
This decrease in marriage is coupled with an increase in divorce. The behaviour
observed over the past few years seems to suggest that half the married couples
will eventually get divorced.
During the 1970s, the clear reduction in fertility among women of Luxembourg
nationality caused a certain amount of concern.The fall in the conjunctural
fertility indicator (average number of children per woman calculated, for a
given year, from the levels of fertility by age of all generations of childbearing
age) seemed spectacular. It fell from 2.36 around 1960 to 1.38 around 1985.Of
course,if you refer to the number of children brought into the world by women
born in the same year and not to this fictitious generation as a base for calculating
the conjunctural indicator, the reduction in fertility is much less pronounced,
while remaining very real. Seen, as unusual, in European terms, it soon became
apparent that this was affecting a great many countries, especially Southern
countries with a traditionally high level of fertility, such as Italy and Portugal.
Developments in these countries did not leave their natives established in Luxembourg
unaffected, as the conjunctural indicator for foreign women also fell sharply,
as the related chart shows. At a certain point, the level was almost the same
as for natives, but the latest figures again show a widening gap.

Decline in mortality
Over a period of 30 years, life expectancy at birth (the synthetic indicator
normally used to measure progress recorded on the mortality front) has increased
by eight years for men and six years for women. Today, it stands at about 75
years for men and some 81 years for women. The clear decline in infant mortality
has played a central role in this trend. The number of deaths of infants under
one year of age per 1 000 live births has dropped through several levels. Between
1970 and 1975, it remained higher than 15 on average. Then, for nearly 10 years,
it stood between 10 and 15. After 1985, it fell and remained below 10.Over the
past few years, it has hovered around five, which matches the level in many
European countries.
This drop in mortality can also be observed at more advanced ages.Male life
expectancy at 70 years old increased from 9.5 years in 1970 to 12.2 years in
2000. For women, it increased from 11.9 years to 15.5 years.
Life expectancies at different ages
Year |
Men |
Women |
| |
age 0 |
age 50 |
age
70 |
age 0 |
age 50 |
age 70 |
| 1970 |
67.3 |
22.4 |
9.5 |
74.5 |
27.5 |
11.9 |
| 1980 |
70.0 |
23.6 |
9.9 |
76.7 |
29.2 |
13.0 |
| 1990 |
72.6 |
26.4 |
11.9 |
79.1 |
31.5 |
14.9 |
| 2000 |
74.7 |
27.4 |
12.2 |
81.1 |
32.8 |
15.5 |
| Source: STATEC |
However, these improvements should be put into perspective. In its White Paper
“Health for All”, published in 1994, the Ministry of Health recognised that
“the comparative rates of mortality by age and gender are higher than in most
EU countries”. Regarding the causes of death, the same document states that
between the late 1970s and the late 1980s, “the cancer death rates are increasing
while deaths from cardio-vascular disease are tending to decrease.The most spectacular
deterioration is seen in the case of deaths from breast cancer (+34.6 %)”.
Fertility and infant mortality in certain European countries
Year |
Luxembourg |
Belgium |
France |
Germany |
Italy |
Portugal |
Austria |
Switzerland |
| Conjunctural
fertility indicator |
| 1970 |
1.97 |
2.25 |
2.47 |
1.99 |
2.43 |
3.01 |
2.29 |
2.10 |
| 1980 |
1.49 |
1.68 |
1.95 |
1.45 |
1.64 |
2.25 |
1.65 |
1.55 |
| 1990 |
1.60 |
1.62 |
1.78 |
1.45 |
1.33 |
1.57 |
1.45 |
1.58 |
| 2000 |
1.79 |
1.66 |
1.89 |
1.36 |
1.23 |
1.52 |
1.34 |
1.50 |
| Infant mortality (deaths
under one year of age per 1000 non life) |
| 1970 |
24.9 |
21.1 |
18.2 |
23.4 |
29.3 |
58.4 |
25.6 |
15.1 |
| 1980 |
11.6 |
12.2 |
10.1 |
12.7 |
14.4 |
24.2 |
14.4 |
9.1 |
| 1990 |
7.4 |
6.6 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
8.2 |
11.0 |
7.9 |
6.9 |
| 2000 |
5.1 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
| Source: STATEC |

An ageing population?
Generally, the ageing of a population is gauged by the proportion of people
over a particular age, with the choice of this demographic threshold (60, 65
or 70 years) being largely arbitrary.
A distinction is often made between the “third age”, covering people who are
between 65 and 79 years old, and the “fourth age” entered at 80. People aged
65 and over have increased in number from 42 800 in 1970 to 61 000 in 2000 (+42.8
%). The level of increase for those aged 80 and over was 20.3 % (5 900 in 1970
and 13 000 in 2000).
Two factors, one relating to the base and the other to the tip of the age pyramid,
can cause ageing: a drop in birth rates and an increase in longevity. So the
demographic process set in motion by sparse generations succeeding full generations
gradually leads to an increase in the relative weight of older people.At a certain
point, the sparse generations find themselves confronted with the full generations
reaching the age of retirement. A clearly increasing life expectancy at higher
ages (see above) obviously helps swell the numbers involved.
Although there is an undeniable increase in the absolute number of elderly
people, their relative weight in the total population is only increasing much
more slowly.This is due to strong net immigration, which is almost continually
feeding the younger age groups.
People aged over 65 and 80
| |
65 and over |
80 and over |
| Year |
No. of
people |
as
% of the total population |
No. of
people |
as % of
the total population |
| 1970 |
42 800 |
12.6 |
5 900 |
1.7 |
| 1980 |
49 600 |
13.6 |
8 200 |
2.3 |
| 1990 |
50 800 |
13.4 |
11 600 |
3.1 |
| 2000 |
61 100 |
14.0 |
13 000 |
3.0 |
| Source: STATEC |

Approaching 700 000 inhabitants?
The accelerating demographic growth during the first half of the 1990s led
STATEC to propose, in its population forecasts, a variant resulting in more
than 700 000 inhabitants by the year 2050. Alongside increased fertility (with
an average number of children per woman of 1.95 after 2020), the annual net
migration of some 4 000 people, equal to that observed prior to the base year
and maintained over the entire forecast period, explains this large increase.
As soon as they are based on a net immigration of around 4 000, the scenarios
produced by the International Labour Office, the UN, EUROSTAT and the Central
Bank of Luxembourg all arrive at a similar conclusion: in 50 years’ time, Luxembourg
will have some 700 000 inhabitants. The assumption that high immigration will
be maintained is only valid if you bank on high economic growth creating a big
demand for labour. There’s another uncertainty surrounding the numbers of this
new labour force that will come and live in the Grand Duchy. Can’t future labour
demands be met by even greater reliance on cross-border workers?
|